Latest Forum Posts
  • Rambling and Gambling
    Super - Thanks QC - Great to have a Top Man on the forum.
    Posted by clancy 3 hours ago in Horse Racing
  • Rambling and Gambling
    It won last week off a mark of 73 and has got a 6lb penalty which has taken it up to 79. Thats what it runs off today. It won at Ripon last Thursday but the ratings for horses are only revised on a [...]
    Posted by Quixall Crossett 4 hours ago in Horse Racing
  • Rambling and Gambling
    All horses lose their form and then come back into form, thats how it goes. They arent machines. But when you start digging a bit deeper and look at the actual facts in front of you, its no wonder tha [...]
    Posted by Quixall Crossett 4 hours ago in Horse Racing
  • Rambling and Gambling
    Ratings question. Faylaq 2.45 was as easy a winner as I have ever seen. Was rated 73. Sporting Life says it went up 12 but it is off 73 today - what am I missing? Thanks.
    Posted by clancy 4 hours ago in Horse Racing
  • Tentative bit of word
    [This post content can only be viewed when logged into the forum]
    Posted by Assassin 6 hours ago in Horse Racing
  • The Price Matters
  • Three to rule Kingdom in Chase at Leicester
  • Hardy Teak to land Fakenham Chase
  • Lively Jaja De Jau looks set to follow up recent win
  • Win or Lose, Tizlove Regardless at Kempton Tonight
Written by · 29 May 2015 · Category: Gambling

Let’s say you fancy a horse to win a certain race. It’s 5/1 in your local bookmakers but it’s 11/2 in the rival bookies further down the road. Will you make the extra walk? Or if you’re an online punter, the horse could be 5/1 on your usual betting site but a quick glance at [read more]

Written by · 24 October 2014 · Category: Horse Racing

Not the best of days yesterday with both selections being very disappointing. Lively Baron was well beaten in 5th and presumably must have needed the run. Jaja De Jau ran well but finished 3rd in what proved to be a competitive race. Hopefully today can be a little better. Teak runs in the 3.40 Fakenham [read more]